Systematic Review AI Tool: Search 40M+ Studies, Cited

AI for systematic reviews: check if your question is already reviewed, search 40M+ citations by study type, flag retractions, find registered trials.

40M+ citations, ~500K trials

Reviews, meta-analyses, RCTs

Free plan, from €19.99/mo

Sources

Evidence sources searched

40M+ study citations

Filter by study type, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and RCTs, and by date, journal, and language. Retractions are flagged and citation counts shown.

Open-access full text

Search inside around 10 million open-access papers, including preprints, for the methods, outcomes, and numbers that abstracts leave out.

Clinical trial registry data

Around 500,000 registered studies with phase, recruitment status, interventions, eligibility, and primary outcomes, for trials that are ongoing or not yet published.

What you can search

What you can look up

Existing reviews

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on your question, so you know whether it has been answered before you write a protocol.

Randomised controlled trials

RCTs filtered by date, journal, and language, each cited and linked.

Retraction flags

Retracted papers are marked, so they do not slip into your evidence base unnoticed.

Ongoing and unpublished trials

Registered studies by recruitment status, to see what evidence is still to come.

Example Searches

Try these searches

“has SGLT2 inhibition in heart failure already been systematically reviewed”

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the question, with dates and citation counts, each linked

“RCTs of tranexamic acid in postpartum haemorrhage since 2015, English and German”

Randomised trials filtered by date and language, cited

“registered trials of GLP-1 agonists in MASH that are still recruiting”

Ongoing studies with phase, interventions, and primary outcomes summarised

“which reported outcomes did the open-access trials on this question use”

Outcome definitions pulled from open-access full text, with the source for each

Challenges & Solutions

Built for how clinicians actually work

01

The problem

You start a review and find out months later that a recent one already answers the question

The solution

Filter 40M+ study citations by study type to see existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses first, with date and citation count, before you commit to a protocol.

Scope first
02

The problem

Retracted studies can end up in an evidence base without anyone noticing

The solution

Wysor flags retracted papers in the results, so you can exclude them deliberately.

Retraction detection
03

The problem

Abstracts leave out the numbers you need, and registered trials that have not published are easy to miss

The solution

Search around 10 million open-access full-text papers, including preprints, and around 500,000 registered trials in the same conversation.

Full text and registry

Check whether your question is already reviewed

The first step of a systematic review is making sure it is needed. Wysor searches 40M+ study citations and filters by study type, so you see existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses on your question, with publication date and citation count, before you write a protocol.

Search the evidence with filters you would set anyway

Narrow by study type (systematic reviews, meta-analyses, RCTs), date, journal, and language. Retracted papers are flagged. For the details abstracts leave out, Wysor searches inside around 10 million open-access papers, including preprints. Every answer cites and links each source.

Registered trials, not only published ones

Publication bias starts with trials that never reach a journal. Wysor searches clinical trial registry data for around 500,000 studies, with phase, recruitment status, interventions, eligibility, and primary outcomes, so ongoing and completed but unpublished studies are visible. The EU clinical trials information system (CTIS) is not covered yet.

What stays with your team

Wysor is a search and reading tool for the evidence, not an automated review. Protocol, screening decisions, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessment, and reporting remain your work.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

No. Wysor helps you scope the question and find and understand the evidence. Protocol, screening, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessment, and reporting stay with your review team.

Yes. Study citations can be filtered by study type, date, journal, and language.

Clinical trial registry data for around 500,000 studies is included. The EU clinical trials information system (CTIS) is not covered yet.

Wysor is EU-hosted, with zero data retention and no training on customer data.

There is a free plan to start, and paid plans from €19.99/mo. No enterprise contract and no sales call.

Start scoping your review

Free to start, no credit card required.

Try Wysor Free

More topics

Explore other topics